Chinese Paper Attacks Critic of San Francisco Chinatown Power Broker Rose Pak

By Matthew Robertson
Matthew Robertson
Matthew Robertson
Matthew Robertson is the former China news editor for The Epoch Times. He was previously a reporter for the newspaper in Washington, D.C. In 2013 he was awarded the Society of Professional Journalists’ Sigma Delta Chi award for coverage of the Chinese regime's forced organ harvesting of prisoners of conscience.
August 25, 2011Updated: October 1, 2015
The Sing Tao Daily in San Francisco on Aug. 23. The first headline reads 'Campaigning in Chinatown, Ed Lee Gets Support.' The headline of the second article translates as 'Calling Ed Lee 'red-baiter,' Peskin Upsets Public.' (The Epoch Times)
The Sing Tao Daily in San Francisco on Aug. 23. The first headline reads 'Campaigning in Chinatown, Ed Lee Gets Support.' The headline of the second article translates as 'Calling Ed Lee 'red-baiter,' Peskin Upsets Public.' (The Epoch Times)

UPDATED: August 26, 2011 at 12:41 a.m. EDT.

Sing Tao, a Chinese-language daily newspaper in San Francisco, launched an exhaustive broadside against former president of the Board of Supervisors Aaron Peskin on Aug. 23. The article described him as a racist and a "red-baiter," compared him to former U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, and called on all Asian candidates to "denounce him openly and refuse a DCCC endorsement." (Peskin is Chairman of the Democratic County Central Committee.)

The article was written in response to interviews Peskin gave to The Epoch Times and its media partners recently. In those interviews, he alleged that incumbent Mayor Ed Lee is controlled by Chinatown power broker Rose Pak, and that Pak serves the interests of the People’s Republic of China.

But the Sing Tao response, which was as much fiery editorial as reporting, might only serve to strengthen Peskin’s point about the way that influence is peddled in San Francisco politics, and about the connections that extend back to China.

The article is over 2,600 characters long in its original Chinese, and takes a format familiar to readers of Chinese Communist publications: testimonials are given one after another of prominent people all denouncing the target of the attack.

Each sub-section highlights another aspect of Peskin’s supposed misdeeds. An individual from "Ed Lee’s election" camp kicks it off, calling Peskin "The Joseph McCarthy of San Francisco" who wishes to bring a "White Terror" upon the town.

Then comes Rose Pak: "I’m actually not surprised by these racist remarks by Peskin. Actually, many liberals are racists, their true colors are being shown now.”

A file photo of Rose Pak taken in 2006.  (The Epoch Times)
A file photo of Rose Pak taken in 2006. (The Epoch Times)
Pak went on to complain that civil rights groups that should defend the Chinese community against racism were silent, naming the ACLU, Chinese for Affirmative Action, and the Asian Law Caucus in particular.

According to Sing Tao, "Peskin’s picking nits about she [Pak] and Ed Lee going to China to travel several times is precisely the manifestation of racism."

Pak adds, in a Sing Tao paraphrase, that "Peskin wants to frighten the public, intimidate them so that Asian people don’t participate in the course of democracy."

A cast of characters in the Chinese community are then marched out, each in turn, to single out Peskin. Subheading highlights include: "Vincent Pan: You Can Raise Questions, But Shouldn’t Use Double Standards to Judge Chinese Traveling to China," "Annie Chung: Groundless Nonsense," "Alicia Wang: Strive to Urge Chinese to Register to Vote" (against Peskin), "Sue Lee: Inconceivable, Racial Discrimination to Such a Stupid Extent," and "Ling-chi Wang: Peskin is a Political Opportunist."

The article concludes on the racial note, pointing out "extreme disappointment" with the fact that the DCCC did not endorse any Chinese American candidates.

A Loyal Newspaper

Sing Tao has 16 global editions in 100 countries, all controlled by the headquarters in Hong Kong, according to an investigation by the Sydney Morning Herald.

The Chinese regime’s United Front Work Department, which grooms friends and isolates enemies of the Communist Party, has been assiduous in courting Sing Tao’s publisher, the cigarette tycoon Charles Ho, the Herald reports; the paper characterizes him as "possibly the single most important link in its overseas Chinese propaganda chain."

Ho was furnished with a seat on the standing committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, and Sing Tao went into a media distribution joint venture with People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s official mouthpiece. Ho also helped set up Xinhua Online, another major mouthpiece of the regime.

The Executive-Editor in Chief of Sing Tao in the United States, Larry Lee, is a former editor of People’s Daily in China.

In August 2008 The Epoch Times reported on a major discrepancy between a report in Sing Tao that was supposed to be a translation from its business partner, the Toronto Star.

It was found that in its "translation" Sing Tao had deleted quotes critical of the Chinese Communist Party’s Tibet policy, inserted several paragraphs of pro-regime and anti-Western boilerplate, and massaged the original piece into something quite different.

After the story broke it was reported widely in the Canadian media. A group of ten Chinese-Canadians penned a joint letter to the Toronto Star saying that Sing Tao had introduced a “propagandist and demagogic slant into the reportage.”

Sing Tao has also been active in spreading anti-Falun Gong propaganda abroad, in one particularly egregious case calling practitioners of this traditional Chinese spiritual practice "terrorists" shortly after the September 11, 2011 terrorist attacks.

Next…A Personal Connection

Alito Warns Congress Has Power to ‘Turn Off the Lights’ at Supreme Court, Defund Activities