HS2 UK High Speed Railway Facing Possible Legal Challenge | Epoch Times
Epoch Times
Search
HS2 UK High Speed Railway Facing Possible Legal Challenge
Feb 17th, 2012 @ 06:40 pm › By Simon Veazey/Epoch Times Staff
↓ Skip to comments
Stop HS2 Campaign coordinator Joe Rukin inflates a giant white elephant outside the campaign headquarters on January 10, 2012 in Kenilworth, United Kingdom. On that day, the government gave the go ahead for the proposed high-speed rail line between London and Birmingham which will be routed through countryside with trains travelling as fast as 225 mph. (Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

Stop HS2 Campaign coordinator Joe Rukin inflates a giant white elephant outside the campaign headquarters on January 10, 2012 in Kenilworth, United Kingdom. On that day, the government gave the go ahead for the proposed high-speed rail line between London and Birmingham which will be routed through countryside with trains travelling as fast as 225 mph. (Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

The HS2 high-speed rail project may soon be facing a legal challenge, say opponents, who propose to challenge the £33 billion project through judicial review.

The group HS2 Action Alliance are also contacting the European Commission over concerns about HS2′s environmental impact.

The group wrote to the Transport Secretary, Justine Greening, on Monday, outlining their intention to challenge through the courts her decision last month to give the green light to the project. 

HS2AA say that the legal basis for the challenge is “the failure of the Department for Transport to comply with the legally binding requirements of the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Regulations 2004 and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010”.

HS2AA claim that the government had failed to carry out the full strategic environmental assessment that SEA regulations require of any important infrastructure project. These should be completed, together with an assessment of all alternatives, before any proposals are presented for public consultation.

Thomas Crane, director of HS2AA, said in a statement: “HS2 is an environmental disaster for our country. It will irreversibly damage many landscapes, ancient woodlands, and wildlife habitats which simply cannot be replaced. It will also do nothing to reduce carbon emissions.

“If the government is determined to push such a scheme, the economic justification should be overwhelming, but this simply isn’t the case. Figures buried by the Department of Transport on January 10th, the announcement day, indicated that the already shaky business case put forward to justify HS2 is now virtually nonexistent.

“The DfT and HS2 Ltd has ridden rough shod over public opinion and many expert voices to ignore all viable alternatives in its desperation to promote HS2. We are still hopeful that Justine Greening will see sense and halt a project which offers such limited benefit for so much environmental damage.” 

Categories: National
Tags: , ,
  • padav

    When it comes to HS2 and the anti-HS2 alliance of campaign groups I’m afraid it’s a simple case of “any port in a storm”

    There is currently a scatter gun approach going on with legal challenges being threatened left, right and centre by a variety of campaign groups – presumably the simple logic involved is; as one attempt fails we can simply line up another behind it to keep the wheels in motion – these are delaying tactics plain and simple; the obvious plan being to try and confound the government timetable to have the Hybrid Bill on the statute book by early 2015.

    Back in the real world, rather than the bubble of unreality inhabited by the anti-HS2 brigade, life goes on as normal. HS2 doesn’t figure on the radarscope of ordinary people and surprise, surprise, the first elements of the long drawn out HS2 implementation process are underway with preliminary access to sites for environmental assessment already happening!

    It was inevitable that, in the wake of the decision to go-ahead with HS2, which brought howls of feigned incredulity from protestors against the scheme, 95% of them residing in close proximity to the approved route, would go legal – after all it was their last chance?